October 22, 2019
  • 2:49 pm The Benefits of Calorie Restriction for Longevity
  • 2:49 pm Big Food and Big Pharma killing for profit?
  • 1:49 pm Dietary Supplement Snake Oil
  • 1:49 pm Little Caesars® | Thin Crust Pepperoni Pizza | Food Review! 🔱🍕😋
  • 1:49 pm Pheasant Eggs vs Chicken Eggs- What’s the Difference?


[Music] we have millions of years of evolution hardwiring us to survive scarcity compensatory survival mechanisms our body uses to defend against weight loss so when we start losing weight we may unconsciously start moving less as a behavioral adaption to conserve energy there are metabolic adaptations as well our metabolism slows down every pound of weight loss may reduce our resting metabolic rate by seven calories a day this may only translate to a few percent differences foremost but can rapidly snowball for those who achieve massive weight loss during one season some of the Biggest Loser contestants famously had their metabolic rates tracked above and beyond the hundreds of calories less it takes to just exist a hundred plus pounds lighter by the end of the season their metabolic rates slowed by an extra 500 calories a day the mind-blower was that six years later they were retested and still had the 500 calorie a day handicap so the contestants had to cut 500 calories more than anyone else their size to maintain the same weight loss no wonder the bulk of their weight was regained most remained at least 10 percent lower than their starting weight though and even a 7% drop has been shown to cut diabetes rates about in half still the metabolic slowing means you have to work that much harder than everyone else just to stay in place analyzing four seasons of The Biggest Loser minute by minute researchers noted that 85% of the focus was on exercise rather than died though the exercise component accounted for less than half of the weight loss even six years after their season ended the contestants had been maintaining an hour of daily vigorous exercise yet still regained most of the weight why because they started eating more they could have cut their sighs – just 20 minutes a day and still maintain a hundred percent of their initial weight loss if they would have just been able to keep their intake under 3,000 calories a day that may not sound like much of a challenge a weight loss doesn’t just slow your metabolism it boosts your appetite if it were just a matter of your weight settling at the point at which your reduced calorie intake matches your reduced calorie output it would take years for your weight loss to plateau instead it often happens within six to eight months and you may know the drill start the diet stick to the diet and then weight loss stalls six months later what happened don’t blame your metabolism it just plays a small part what happened is that you likely actually stopped sticking to your diet because your appetite went on a rampage let’s break it down if you cut 800 calories out of your daily diet 2600 calories a day down to 1,800 and your weight-loss stalls after six months then what happened is that at the end of the first month you think you’re still cutting 800 calories but you may actually only be down about 600 calories a day by month – you’re only down about 500 months 3 300 and by month 6 you’re only eating 200 calories less than before you went on the diet in other words you inadvertently suffered an exponential increase in calorie intake over those six months yet you may not even realize it because by that time your body may have ramped your appetite up 600 calories so it still feels as though you’re eating 800 calories less but it’s actually only 200 since an 800 calorie drop in intake may slow your metabolism and physical activity about 200 calories a day with no difference between calories in and calories out at 6 months no wonder your weight loss grinds to a complete halt the slow upward drifting calorie intake on a new diet is not because you got lazy once your appetite is boosted by 600 calories after diet and while eating 200 calories less at the end is as hard as eating 800 calories less at the beginning so you can maintain the same disciplined level of willpower and self-control and still end up stagnating to prevent this from happening you need to maintain the calorie deficit how is that possible in the face of a ravenous appetite hunger is a biological drive asking someone to eat smaller portions is like asking someone to take fewer breaths you can white-knuckle it for a bit but eventually nature wins out that’s why I wrote how not to diet there are foods that can counter the slowing of our metabolism and suppress our appetite ways of eating to counter the behavioral adaptation and even eat more food yet still lose weight due to the metabolic slowing and increased appetite that accompanies weight loss sustained weight loss requires a persistent calorie deficit of 300 to 500 calories a day this can be accomplished without reducing portion sizes simply by lowering the calorie density of meals this can result in the rare combination of weight loss with both an increase in quality and even quantity of food consumed I’m gonna do a whole series of videos about it the bottom line is that sustainable weight loss is not about eating less food it’s about eating better food [Music] you

Randall Smitham

RELATED ARTICLES
LEAVE A COMMENT